<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh Ye Of Little Faith</title>
	<link>http://headingright.com/2008/02/16/oh-ye-of-little-faith/</link>
	<description>Hot spot for Republican, Conservative and Libertarian Hosts &#038; Fans of Blog Talk Radio</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: gary  fouse</title>
		<link>http://headingright.com/2008/02/16/oh-ye-of-little-faith/#comment-14142</link>
		<author>gary  fouse</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://headingright.com/2008/02/16/oh-ye-of-little-faith/#comment-14142</guid>
					<description>This week, radio talk show host and conservative blogger, Hugh Hewitt has been playing excerpts of Michelle Obama's speech at UCLA on February 3. It is not the first time I have heard or seen her speak on TV or radio. Hewitt's reaction is that the tone of Mrs Obama's speech is quite negative as to the country and our people. I have to agree here. I have drawn the same conclusion from previous speeches Mrs Obama has made. If her husband is viewed as being hopeful and optimistic, his wife's words come across (at least to me) as negative and angry.

Make no mistake about it. Michelle Obama is an impressive figure. She is obviously bright, attractive, and has an effective speaking presentation. Yet, like her husband, I wonder if her listeners are really stopping to analyze her message. To me, Mrs Obama is an angry woman who has some pretty negative opinions about her country and our people.

In the UCLA appearnce at Pauley Pavilian, Mrs Obama went through a litany of all the things that are wrong with America. Much like John Edwards, she complains about the inability of everyday people to obtain health care, insurance, and this and that, as if we were living in Bangladesh. I have heard her make these complaints before. At UCLA, she also complained that Americans are walling ourselves off from each other (I am paraphrasing). According to her, we fear and distrust each other. I found myself wishing that she would have gone deeper into this theme. Who specifically was she referring to? Was she really saying that white people fear and distrust black people-or vis-versa? If that is what she means, then it might be worthwhile to spell it out and let's have a discussion or debate on that topic. But, alas, she let it hang. After all, she was getting so many cheers from the young audience, that she didn't need to take it any farther than that. 

Then, of course, Mrs Obama told her audience that the only person who could turn things around in this country was her husband, Barack Obama-then led the crowd into the old demogogic chant of "Yes, we can, Yes, we can, yes, we can!" 

I should concede here that many listeners on the left have commented very approvingly of her speech, but those on the left generally do enjoy hearing the negative points of America, so that is hardly surprising. 

If we need to dig deeper into Barack Obama's words and look beyond the soaring oratory (which we should), I think we need to do the same with the prospective First Lady. Her message seems to be very much like that of John Edwards; the negative thesis, the negative tone, what's wrong with our country, class envy, and so on. Michelle Obama may come across as inspiring to many, but to me, she seems angry, with a rather negative outlook on our country. It reinforces my concern that there is a hidden agenda behind the Obamas' vision for America.

gary fouse
fousesquawk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, radio talk show host and conservative blogger, Hugh Hewitt has been playing excerpts of Michelle Obama&#8217;s speech at UCLA on February 3. It is not the first time I have heard or seen her speak on TV or radio. Hewitt&#8217;s reaction is that the tone of Mrs Obama&#8217;s speech is quite negative as to the country and our people. I have to agree here. I have drawn the same conclusion from previous speeches Mrs Obama has made. If her husband is viewed as being hopeful and optimistic, his wife&#8217;s words come across (at least to me) as negative and angry.</p>
<p>Make no mistake about it. Michelle Obama is an impressive figure. She is obviously bright, attractive, and has an effective speaking presentation. Yet, like her husband, I wonder if her listeners are really stopping to analyze her message. To me, Mrs Obama is an angry woman who has some pretty negative opinions about her country and our people.</p>
<p>In the UCLA appearnce at Pauley Pavilian, Mrs Obama went through a litany of all the things that are wrong with America. Much like John Edwards, she complains about the inability of everyday people to obtain health care, insurance, and this and that, as if we were living in Bangladesh. I have heard her make these complaints before. At UCLA, she also complained that Americans are walling ourselves off from each other (I am paraphrasing). According to her, we fear and distrust each other. I found myself wishing that she would have gone deeper into this theme. Who specifically was she referring to? Was she really saying that white people fear and distrust black people-or vis-versa? If that is what she means, then it might be worthwhile to spell it out and let&#8217;s have a discussion or debate on that topic. But, alas, she let it hang. After all, she was getting so many cheers from the young audience, that she didn&#8217;t need to take it any farther than that. </p>
<p>Then, of course, Mrs Obama told her audience that the only person who could turn things around in this country was her husband, Barack Obama-then led the crowd into the old demogogic chant of &#8220;Yes, we can, Yes, we can, yes, we can!&#8221; </p>
<p>I should concede here that many listeners on the left have commented very approvingly of her speech, but those on the left generally do enjoy hearing the negative points of America, so that is hardly surprising. </p>
<p>If we need to dig deeper into Barack Obama&#8217;s words and look beyond the soaring oratory (which we should), I think we need to do the same with the prospective First Lady. Her message seems to be very much like that of John Edwards; the negative thesis, the negative tone, what&#8217;s wrong with our country, class envy, and so on. Michelle Obama may come across as inspiring to many, but to me, she seems angry, with a rather negative outlook on our country. It reinforces my concern that there is a hidden agenda behind the Obamas&#8217; vision for America.</p>
<p>gary fouse<br />
fousesquawk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
