A Few Additional Thoughts On The Way To The Political Guillotine

***If, as I expect, Mitt Romney or Fred Thompson is the 2008 GOP nominee, why would conservatives have to “hold their noses” to vote for them?

***Keeping Hillary! out of the White House next year will probably be impossible no matter who the Republican standard-bearer is.  After that it won’t be too long before the current intra-party spat starts looking pretty silly.

I remember “Read my lips”; I remember how outraged conservatives took a walk on Bush41 in 1992, and the ensuing two years of, shall we say, “unintended consequences.”  This is history being its cyclical self.

***If, as Peggy Noonan argues today, the Bushies and their in-party allies are contemptuous of the GOP base, couldn’t the former’s seemingly irrational attacks on the latter actually be a rather shrewd ploy to goad conservatives into bolting the party, which just happens to be the dream every RINO holds closest to his/her stony heart?  Thus would close the circle opened when Goldwater backers hooted and jeered Nelson Rockefeller at the 1964 Republican convention, the common thread the indiscreet disapprobation of the Right, the key difference that this time, the RINOs would get the last laugh.

***The Constitution Party, like any third party, is like New Coke: looks good on paper, but isn’t going anywhere.  May as well nickname it the “political white flag” party, because any disgruntled conservative who flees there is, in any practical, realistic sense, giving up the fight.

The political winds are already “lefterly” and will remain that way for at least the next several years.  “Staying the course” in the GOP may be the difference between coming back in 2010 or 2012 and being completely out of it for a generation or more.

Others may choose the latter as they will.  I’ll still opt for the former - every time.

One Response to “A Few Additional Thoughts On The Way To The Political Guillotine”

You can subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post. You can also reply to this post directly in your weblog, and take advantage of the TrackBack URI to record your reply in this post.

  1. Spec Bowers says:

    > I remember how outraged conservatives took a walk on Bush41 in 1992, and the ensuing two years of, shall we say, “unintended consequences.”

    I would argue that defeat of Bush41 was GOOD for conservatives. Had Bush been reelected there is no way that Republicans would have won the House in ‘94. The short-term pain of Clinton led to long-term gain.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>