John Edwards was the best part of the debate?

When Huckabee made his “John Edwards in a beauty shop” joke, it was the best part of the debate.  Okay, maybe that’s a little drastic.  Duncan Hunter clearly came across as the most solid, most conservative, and best candidate for the Republican Party.  His stance on the illegal immigration issue was the strongest.  Rudy’s stance on the war in Iraq was supported by his experience, and his liberal positions on social issues may not matter if the voter zeroes in on the war on terror, but for some those liberal stances on abortion, gay rights and gun control may make him unelectable by some.  McCain and Romney provided action attacking each other, and that made for some fun.  Romney sounded strong on the issues, and conservative for the most part, but can his history of changing his mind be trusted?  Huckabee and Hunter were the clear winners, wit Rudy Guiliani close behind.  Ron Paul was the idiotic loser.

No Responses to “John Edwards was the best part of the debate?”

You can subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post. You can also reply to this post directly in your weblog, and take advantage of the TrackBack URI to record your reply in this post.

  1. No comments posted yet

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>